THE DOCTRINE OF REFLECTION
[1]
by Bishop George de Charms
[2]
THE NATURE AND IMPORTANCE OF THIS DOCTRINE
CHAPTER I
“There are more arcana in the doctrine of reflection than in any other
whatever.” This arresting statement is found in number 733 of the “Spiritual
Diary” by Emanuel Swedenborg. It seems to challenge the generally
accepted view, for we have been prone to think of reflection as merely
one form, among many, of mental activity. We would ordinarily place it
in the same category as sensation, memory, imagination and thought.
Why should it contain more arcana than any of these? Are there not
other doctrines that are of even greater importance? Consider
creation, redemption and glorification; or influx, providence and
regeneration. Must these not have an even broader application than the
doctrine of reflection?
However, when we analyze the teaching of the Writings on the subject
of reflection, we learn that it has a universal application because it
underlies all the other operations of the human mind. All
consciousness depends upon it. Without it there can be no sensation,
memory, imagination or thought. Without it the Lord could not have
effected the glorification of His Human; nor could He have provided
for our regeneration and the salvation of the human race. Not only
does it contain the key to the understanding of all the conscious
activities of the human mind, but it explains all the countless
phenomena of the spiritual world. The life of people on earth is
distinguished from that of angels and spirits solely by the fact that
they have a distinctly different plane of reflection. Because of this,
the inhabitants of one world can be completely unconscious of those in
the other world, and at the same time can be in constant and intimate
association with them. Without this association there could be no
conscious life in either world. Open communication between the two
worlds is made possible only by bringing both people and spirits
temporarily into a state of reflection that is common to both.
Furthermore, the doctrine of reflection has never been revealed before
in the entire history of the human race. The laws of reflection have
indeed been operative from the beginning of time, but they have not
been known. People have enjoyed the benefits of their operation, and
have taken them for granted without even trying to understand them.
Just as the laws of gravity existed before the time of Newton, and
those of electricity before Franklin began to investigate them, so the
laws of reflection were operative before they were revealed in the
Writings of the Lord's Second coming. They were unknown to the people
of the Most Ancient Church who nevertheless had great heavenly wisdom.
They were concealed from the people of the Ancient Church even in the
days of its pristine glory. They could not be made known to those who
belonged to the Jewish Church, nor even to Christians before the Lord
had made His second coming. Only through the medium of one who could
live consciously in both worlds at the same time, and who therefore
could compare the two worlds and note how each was related to the
other, could the laws of reflection be made known.
These laws are now laid open by the Lord because some understanding of
them is vital to the establishment of the New Church. Indeed the whole
purpose of the Lord's Advent was that His heavenly kingdom may be
established on the earth. By this is meant a kingdom of heavenly uses
in which people may have a greater measure of responsibility and a
greater sense of participation than was ever possible before. Being
enabled to perform spiritual uses, people can receive the Lord's life
in greater fullness and with deeper enjoyment; wherefore the Lord said
to His disciples: “I am come that they may have life, and that they
may have it more abundantly” (John 10:10). The ability to perform any
use depends upon a knowledge and understanding of the laws that are
applicable to it. Only the knowledge of spiritual laws can open the
way to the performance of spiritual uses. The doctrine of reflection
has been revealed to the end that people may be introduced to a whole
new realm of spiritual uses, together with the joy of accomplishment
that this makes possible.
But
what do we mean by “reflection”? The root meaning of the word
“reflect” is to bend back. It refers to the bending back of any force
that strikes upon a resisting object. Thus light is reflected from a
mirror, and heat waves are reflected from a pavement. Similarly in
regard to the things of the mind. A stream of sense impulses is
passing through the mind every waking moment. Only when this stream is
arrested at some point, that is, when one pays attention to it, is it
“bent back” or “reflected.” Then for the first time does it produce a
conscious sensation. We are said to “look” at something because it
“strikes our fancy.” We perceive it as something that has an important
relation to our life, as something that gives either pleasure or pain.
For this reason we “take an interest” in it, and are said to “reflect
upon it.” Thousands of sense impulses pass by unheeded; but whatever
we reflect upon is perceived and felt. We become aware of it. The
impulses to which we do not pay attention nevertheless make an
impression upon the mind, and are stored up in the interior memory,
producing there an unconscious background out of which new sensations
may arise; but the mental world in which we live is made up of a
selected strand of sense impulses to which we pay attention, upon
which we reflect, and of which therefore we become conscious.
The
focus of attention varies with every one according to the love that is
active in the mind at any particular time. For this reason the same
experience will make a different impression upon different people. One
will “see” what another passes by unnoticed. For this reason two
people may derive from the same environment very different ideas, and
thus may live in different mental worlds.
Not
only human beings, but animals also can reflect. They instinctively
pay attention to the things in their environment that have relation to
their life. They recognize their own food, and distinguish it from
whatever would be injurious to their health. They know how to avoid
their enemies, and how to protect their young. They can remember and
recall sensations or experiences that are important to their life.
They seek what is needful, and avoid what is hurtful. All this they do
spontaneously without knowing why. But they cannot reflect upon
themselves; that is, upon what takes place within their own mind. They
are impelled by a single love which is their whole life, and this love
dictates all their conscious sensations.
Human beings, on the other hand, are capable of being influenced by
various loves or affections. They therefore can see things differently
at different times, or in different states of mind. While seeing an
experience in one state of mind, they can still remember how it
appeared under the influence of another affection. They can compare
these two divergent impressions, and so can decide which they will
retain as true, and which they will reject. Thus they can reflect, not
only upon material objects, but also upon ideas, and can analyze the
nature and quality of their own thoughts. Thus they have a plane of
reflection that animals do not possess—a plane whereby they know
themselves or become aware of the various loves by which they are
moved at different times; and because of this they can choose the
loves that are to qualify their life, and thus can determine their own
character. In this ability lies the moral and spiritual freedom that
distinguishes them from the animal creation and makes them human. That
is what enables us to become aware of spiritual things, and thus to
live in a spiritual world. It is the secret of his immortality.
All
conscious life is the product of reflection, but human consciousness
is the product of spiritual reflection; that is, reflection upon the
nature and quality of human life itself, its origin, its inner
content, its relation, not only to the world of material objects but
also to love itself, and thus to God. Of this, we become aware from
the teaching of the Word concerning God; that is, concerning the
essential quality of love and wisdom. Of this no one would become
aware merely by reflecting upon our own inner feelings. These appear
to arise within ourselves. We perceive them only as to their effects.
We cannot know, apart from the teaching of the Word, that they inflow
from the Lord through the spiritual world, and thus through angels and
spirits in that world. Their origin is not in us, but outside of us;
and only when this is realized can we understand that they are not
inevitable. We have the power to determine which of them we will make
our own, and which we will reject. This no one could possibly know
except by reflection upon the teaching of the Word.
Mankind was endowed from creation with the faculty of spiritual
reflection. As soon as he became capable of exercising this faculty,
the human soul became immortal. Before this time it could hardly be
said that “people” existed, except perhaps in potency. The foetus in
the womb may be said to be “human” because of the human life in the
seed that progressively builds the body of a potential human being.
But the foetus has no power of reflection, and therefore has no
conscious life, either on earth or in the spiritual world. It is not
the body, but the mind that makes the person. Without reflection there
is no conscious mind, no awareness of life, no enjoyment of human
qualities and attributes; that is, of love and wisdom which are the
essential human.
These qualities can be acquired only after birth, and even then, only
by slow degrees. Reflection begins with an infant by noticing most
general sensations—the contrast between light and shade, outline and
what lies beyond, rough and smooth, loud and soft, and so forth. This
is the first plane of consciousness. Only after innumerable such
sensations have been perceived and stored in the memory can the infant
begin to recognize the relation of various sensations to one another,
and so to discover “things.” Then for the first time does the infant
begin to picture things in the imagination, and identify these mental
pictures with names. He begins to ask “what” things are, and to
reflect upon the combinations of many isolated sensations. Later the
young child discovers what things do, what they are for, and how they
can be used. When he begins to reflect upon this he no longer is
satisfied to discover things and call them by name. He wants a story
about them. He wants to know what they do and why they do it. Here
again is a new plane of reflection that opens before the child a vast
new world to be explored. As he grows older he begins to recognize
abstract ideas, qualities of immaterial or spiritual things, things
moral and philosophical, thoughts, truths, and affections or loves.
Such are the stages of mental growth from infancy to adult age, and
for this reason reflection upon spiritual things is not possible in
childhood.
The
same law of mental development applies to the race. The first people
achieved spiritual wisdom, but only by reflecting upon sensations.
They perceived spiritual truths within the superficial appearances of
nature, the shapes and colors of objects, the sounds of wind and wave,
the contrast of light and darkness, of day and night. A study of what
is involved in this kind of reflection would throw a flood of light
upon the nature and mental quality of that most ancient wisdom, as
contrasted with the wisdom that is common to people in modern times.
In
the Ancient Church reflection was centered upon knowledges drawn from
the Word, from which arose the science of correspondences. Theirs was
a different kind of wisdom, concerning which, perhaps we can have a
somewhat better idea because it is something we also can experience.
Yet unlike ourselves, those ancient people had no regard to scientific
facts, to historic accuracy, but only to a parable, a story with a
meaning.
When the Lord came into the world, He introduced his disciples to
still another plane of reflection; namely, of abstract ideas and their
importance to our spiritual life. He introduced not only the parable,
but also the doctrinal sermon, and this became the chief focus of
Christian worship. Such doctrine was the expression of a love, an
affection, an emotion, rather than an intellectual understanding. That
is why such irrational doctrines could be accepted on faith without
understanding—the doctrine of a God in three persons, the doctrine of
original sin and a vicarious atonement, the doctrine of the
resurrection of the body, and many others.
Not
until the second coming of the Lord could we be given to reflect even
upon reflection itself, and thus to understand spiritual things
rationally, and so “enter intellectually into the mysteries of faith.”
Again a whole new world is presented for exploration—a world of
spiritual use, of participation with the Lord in His Divine work of
salvation, together with a sense of accomplishment and enjoyment never
possible before. Because this new plane of reflection is of such vital
importance to the establishment of the New Church, we have been moved
to search out from the Writings the doctrine of reflection which alone
brings that plane within the reach of human minds, and opens up a
limitless opportunity for the establishment, by gradual stages, of the
Lord's promised kingdom on earth.
This series of studies was first received by the journal's late
editor, Lennart O. Alfelt, who entered the spiritual world in
1981; this places it, perhaps, some time in the 1970s. There is
nothing on the typescript to give us a firm date. It was found
among material in an archive belonging to the Swedenborg
Scientific Association, and was only recently perused. Inquiries
of people who may have known something about this series brought
nothing to light; nor did a search in New Church Life and
The New Philosophy. We therefore feel more or less assured
that this publication of the series is its first, and we feel
honoured to bring this illuminating collection to our readers'
attention. [The New Philosophy, Journal of the Swedenborg
Scientific Association. Jan.— June 2004.]
George de Charms (1889—1988) is widely known in New Church circles
for his extraordinary devotion to the New Church and for his
wide-ranging contributions to its life. He was Executive Bishop of
the General Church of the New Jerusalem from 1937 to his
retirement in 1961. Rev. Kurt H. Asplundh spoke of him in a
Memorial Address in the following terms: “Bishop de Charms has
left a legacy for the General Church—not only a vast production of
creative thought and written doctrinal study, prolific and
provocative, but more importantly, he has impressed on the church
a lasting attitude—an exciting sense of the promise of spiritual
discovery which is the reward of a careful and devout exploration
of the Word. In his own considerable efforts in this he gave an
example of simple humility. How often he characterized his own
work as a mere beginning, a feeble effort, a faltering first step.
His wisdom was great in the acknowledgment of how little he felt
he knew. For this leadership we must be ever grateful.” Notable
published studies include Harmony of the Four Gospels
(Academy of the New Church Press 1978); The Growth of the Mind:
A New Church Interpretation (Academy Book Room 1953.); and
Imagination and Rationality (SSA 1981).
|