The Lord caused
Israel to preface their law with three commandments which made the whole into a
Divine law. The first of these stated that the Lord Jehovah alone is God, and
required that He alone be worshipped. In the second, which bids us not to take
His name in vain, we see an added requirement which must mark us if we would be
more than merely natural, civil, and moral men, but also citizens in the
spiritual kingdom of love and charity.
The doctrine of the New Church teaches us that "the signs of charity are all the
things which pertain to worship" (Char. viii). The sign which indicates that one
has charity is not - as is generally believed - "good works," but piety. Good
works, helpfulness, altruism, generosity, are signs, not so much of charity as
of civil loyalties, and may proceed from the love of worldly praise, honor, and
power, or from the natural good of friendliness and inborn good nature. But the
sign of true charity - the necessary mark of the spiritual man who acts not from
self but from charity - is piety.
The broad meaning of the Second Commandment is, that man must be pious, must not
be irreverent, must not take lightly his relation to the Lord, must not
blaspheme or misuse the Lord's name which is "holy and reverend." In its literal
form, this precept took such a hold upon Jewish minds that eventually a Jew did
not even dare to pronounce the name Jehovah even while reading it in the Word.
The same extreme reverence was shown to the Ark and the vessels of the
Sanctuary. These were not touched except by ritual modes and by sanctified
hands. The idea of holiness was that what was holy was set apart - held in fear;
for contact with it meant a blessing only if such contact was obtained by
prescribed rituals; otherwise a curse or calamity would follow.
In common with other nations of the
decadent Ancient Church, the Jews were convinced of the power and holiness of
certain names. The prophets, too, performed miracles in the sacred name of
Jehovah. The Lord, when on earth, allowed His disciples to control demons and do
works of healing in His name - thus proving its holiness. But neither the
Israelites nor the disciples came to understand that this use of the name was
not any benevolent magic, but a Divine application of a profound spiritual law -
a law of the spiritual world, the world of human minds and spirits. For it was
not the name only, but all the conditions and needs and states of mankind both
on earth and in the heavens, which called forth the miracle. And although such
miracles do not occur in the same manifest ways at this day, yet the power of
the Lord's name is not lessened. He grants men whatsoever they pray "in His
name," and "when two or three are gathered together in His name," He is in the
midst of them.
But let us reflect on the meaning
of this 'name.' A name is that which makes a man known to us. It means his fame
and reputed qualities, his influence among men, his power, his abilities to
perform uses. When a spirit enters into eternal life, his earthly name and fame
are forgotten, and a new name is given him, by which his real qualities are
described in the spiritual language of ideas. And such a new naming is also of
order, when a man enters into the Church on earth by the gate of Baptism - to
signify the new quality which he then assumes.
The name of the Lord our God therefore, in a spiritual sense, represents His infinite, Divinely Human qualities. It means His Divine which proceeds from Him as Divine truth, as the light and heat of the spiritual Sun. It means everything of Divine revelation by which His qualities are made known; and thus it includes everything of His Word, in its letter as well as its spirit. It extends into the worship of the Church into which the Word enters, and to the whole Church and to the sphere of Divine Good which - from the Lord - pervades its worship and life.
All that is commanded by the Lord, and therefore done in His name and on His behalf, is a means of His holy presence. For by His 'name' is meant His Divine Order, His plan of salvation, His way of bringing His rule into the minds and hearts and personal lives of men and into the government and institutional uses of the Church. All good and all truth are of His name, and in them are vested His power and His holiness.
This inclusive meaning is given in the
Arcana Coelestia, where the precept, "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord in vain," is explained to mean, that we must not profane or blaspheme the truth and good of faith; we must not turn truth into falsity by avowing the truth yet living in evil; nor turn good into falsity, by deliberately living under holy pretences while yet not believing the truth (AC 8882). For, if so, the Lord cannot hold us guiltless.
The evil which is here described is
the evil of profanation, the mingling of good and evil, the conjunction within
one mind of heaven and hell. No evil - so the Doctrine reveals - can be more
terrible than such a profaning of what is holy by what is evil. The ancients,
even the primitive peoples whose fragmentary wisdom men scorn at this day, lived
in a manner closer to the spiritual world than we moderns who live in a world
where nothing is held sacred. And therefore - despite their ignorance of
physical laws - they knew the truth about profanation and its direful
punishments. They lived in fear of sinning against something that was holy, of
offending the gods. And this led them into gross idolatries and superstitions,
because they lost their original discernment of what holiness was.
But we, in the New Church, are
given to know what is holy. We know that the Word is the holy ultimate of Divine
order upon earth; that upon it the Lord has put His none, and that He dwells
within His Word and is present in its sacred teachings to bend our affections
heavenward and to strengthen our faith in Him.
When the Pharisees had suggested
that Jesus drove out evil spirits by the power of Beelzebub; and when they thus
denied His Divine power - His Divine Spirit and Soul - the Lord replied by
saying, "All manner of sin and blasphemy shall be forgiven unto men, but the
blasphemy against the Spirit shall not be forgiven unto men. And whosoever speaketh a word against the Son of Man, it shall be forgiven him; but whosoever
speaketh against the Holy Spirit, it shall not be forgiven him, neither in this
age, nor in the age to come" (Matthew 12:31, 32).
To "speak a word against the Son of
Man" means for a man to deny some truth of doctrine while he still looks to the
Word as the source of truth, believing that in it and from it are Divine truths.
Necessarily, the manifold truths which the Church draws from its Revelations
cannot be equally seen by all men or in all states. There must be freedom to
judge whether such doctrines are Divine truths or merely formed from appearances
on the surface of Revelation. And so long as truths are not yet implanted by
faith into the conscience, or inscribed upon man's life, they come to man with
their Divine character veiled, and are what is meant by the Son of Man. Hence
the Lord said, "When the Son of Man cometh, shall He find faith on the earth?"
(Luke 18:8). "The Foxes have holes, and the birds of the air have nests; but the
Son of Man hath not where to lay His head" (Matthew 8:20). Such truth, whether
it appear as a Savior or as a Judge, is not yet interiorly received, nor is its
inmost connection with religious life recognized. Man is pardoned if he doubts
or reasons against it, pardoned if he struggles against it, and resists the
demands it makes upon his life. And indeed he may seek to blind himself against
its Divine authority and to hide himself from the judgment which the truth might
bring about within Him.
We cannot
say that such states of obscurity, doubt, and rebellion, are guiltless; for they
spring from the refractory will of man. But they can still be forgiven: they can
yield and pass away, provided only that man will seek affirmatively for light in
the Word.
Not so the sin against the Holy Spirit. This is a denial of the holiness, the
Divinity, the inspiration of the Word a denial which closes heaven to man. Or,
it is a denial of the Divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ. It is a denial that the
Spirit of God is in the Word or is in the Lord's Human. And it is unforgivable
to Christians: not because the Lord resents this sin more than any other, but
because there is no hope for any one who - in this world or the next - sees yet
wittingly denies and rejects these means which the Lord extends for his
salvation.
The celestial angels, above all
others, have the perception of the utmost necessity of the acknowledgment of the
Lord in His Divine Human as the only possible means of salvation. They see that
a man's unwillingness to acknowledge God as the source of all human qualities,
profanes the name of God and induces a brutal coldness into all the thoughts of
his mind, which can then be stirred only by the fires of evil. The celestial
sense of the Second Commandment therefore is, not to deny the Divinity of the
Lord's Human. For with this denial angelic spheres depart from the interiors of
man's mind.
Much may be read in the Writings
concerning profanation. In its most direful and interior form - which the whole
force of Divine Providence seeks to prevent - it is the deliberate mingling of
evil affections and falsities of evil with the holy things of good and truth.
Those who become such profaners are excluded not only from heaven but from hell,
until their minds and spiritual bodies are reduced by a terrible process of
vastation into an almost senseless and lifeless state - a living death. And this
eventuates, not as a punishment, but because confirmed good and confirmed evil
have produced a double yearning in the mind – a belief in truth and in fantasy
at once. Such an unbearable state cannot be stamped out or dissolved except by a
pulling asunder of the roots of a man's life, and, with this, a carrying away of
as much of man's spiritual life as has been profaned (AC 8882).
It is to prevent such interior profanation that "the Lord admits man interiorly
into the truths of wisdom and into goods of love only so far as he can be kept
in them to the end of his life" (DP 232-233). It is because of this that guards
are placed about interior truths such as are in the spiritual sense of the Word
- and that the letter of the Word consists of parables and appearances. The
first responsibility of the man of the Church is therefore to keep the Word
holy. For all profanation - in its descending degrees - begins with something of
contempt in the externals of our thought. The need of watchfulness lest
something holy be degraded or desecrated, is indicated in the Lord's saying
"that every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in
the day of judgment" (Matt.12:36).
It cannot be doubted that this is a
warning against the vulgar habit of bursting out in impatient and condemnatory
language which hurts the sensibilities of others - as well as against the
employment of useless oaths in which the name of God is "taken in vain." But
such "idle words" become of the greatest moment the more they are joined with a
contempt of the Word and its purpose - which is human salvation! and so far as
they spread, as today, into a depraved custom of using names and sayings from
the Word as witticisms, some indecorous, some openly profane.
In the New Church
there is no need for artificial solemnity, nor for morbid sadness, in the
exercise and expression of our religious convictions. There should be no fear of
taking the Lord's name upon our lips, no undue anxiety or embarrassment or
timidity about introducing the things of the Church and of the Word into our
social conversations. Religion belongs to all things of life. Nor should any
excessive fear of profanation either prevent us from entering interiorly and
rationally into the mysteries of faith, or discourage us from taking part in the
worship of the Church "frequently every year receiving the sacrament of the
Supper, and performing the other parts of worship according to the ordinances of
the Church" (HD 124). If there is sincerity, together with a desire to continue
to resist evils, there is not only protection against profanation but also the
promise of spiritual progress, and an interior joy in the worship of the Lord.
The Gospel of the Second Advent of
the Lord is one of great joy. As long as the children of the bride-chamber have
the Bridegroom amongst them, they cannot fast. Humiliation before the Lord,
reverence of His name, does not imply a condemnation of the wholesome human
delights of mind and body, or an abstinence from lighthearted relaxation.
Indeed, among the diversions of charity the Doctrine mentions "decorous wit" and
harmless humor.
Yet in our whiles
of recreation we largely live in our sensual degree: and - since the sensual is
at best only in a process of being disciplined and purified - there are apt to
be present in such states the play of many corporeal affections which would
profane the name of the Lord and the things of the Church if such things are
improperly introduced without adequate reflection. To use anything holy in
flippant or "frivolous conversation," is therefore proscribed and forbidden to
the New Churchman (TCR 298). And this is done to prevent the sphere of the
world's interior contempt for the holy things of the Word from infesting the
Church. For habits of speech which may not be deeply profane to many in the
world who lack the knowledge of what is holy, would with us become deeply
hurtful.
The Writings speak of a law
operating within the organic mind of man, called the law of associated ideas.
When a name or expression from the Word is made an occasion for laughter or
derision, such ideas with their pervert delights attach themselves to that name,
and are recalled whenever this is read or called to mind: producing an interior
presence of both heaven and hell. And in the other life man will then have lost
the use of this holy ultimate as a means of inviting angelic aid (SD 1304).
The habit of jesting about holy
things becomes a wedge which pries open the mind, already swept and furnished by
religion, for the entrance of a worse profanation. The name of the Lord is holy.
The idea of the Lord, whenever it is suggested in the thought, must be paramount
- never subjected to thoughts of trivial sort. When it is brought to bear (as it
should) on everyday affairs, it must always dominate. Frivolity in religious
matters is a tool of hell for undermining the sanctities of life.
There is no more wasting argument
against any cause than laughter. This argument of scorn and derision is usually
at war with charity, and is often profane - as when it was visited upon the Lord
in the palace of the high priest. It is our part - be we young or old, unworthy
disciples of the Lord's new truth - to realize that we cannot always laugh when
the world laughs, cannot join in the clever cynicisms that are everywhere
directed against the holiest things of life - against the sanctities of
spiritual doctrine or against the sanctities of conjugial love; nor treat
lightly the sanctity of friendship or imposed trust, even if it may be only a
child who so trusts us.
There are many things in the life
of every man which must be respected as sacred: sacred because they come from
the Lord, and are basic to salvation - the means and conditions by which eternal
life is acquired. Chief among these is the freedom of others - which is given
from the Lord and is an intrinsic part of His order, a part of His wonderful
name. For that which is not ours, belongs in reality to the Lord; and that which
is ours only seems to be our own. This widening perception of all things of life
as sacred to a Divine purpose is that which can bring the true wisdom of
innocence to men, and which will lead the Church to the fulfillment of its
eternal prayer: "Hallowed be Thy name."
Exod. 20:7; Deut. 5:1-22; Mark 3:20-35; SD 1304